Re: Code review/discussion time again.

[David Kastrup]

Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:55:20AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Well, given my apparent discrepance between coding and social
>> interaction skills, the resulting dearth of actually useful advice and
>> other things (recently a patch of mine was rejected that actually would
>> have brought some oversights in line with the rest), I think that it
>> might be the smoothest course of action if I just had commit access
>> myself.
>
> The rejected patch is unfortunate, but in the near future I think
> we'll continue to see good things sometimes being rejected.  Most
> developers (including Carl) only know bits and pieces of the
> architecture, so a lot of patches won't be understood.

That's not a good situation.  Developers come and go.  So it would seem
like a good idea to make the architecture more transparent.  Part of
that is documentation, part of it is simplification.

-- 
David Kastrup