[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
why recommend \relative to take a "c"?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
why recommend \relative to take a "c"? |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:00:52 -0800 (PST) |
In NR 1.1.1 "Writing pitches" -- Relative octave entry,
"it is recommended that [startpitch] be an octave of c."
Why? Most of the time it won't even be the "startpitch".
Perhaps "referencepitch" is more accurate, but what's wrong
with "\relative fis"? Doing "\relative c" when the first
note is F-sharp is weird to me. It's like when the
orchestra tunes to A440 and then plays a symphony in E-flat.
Is there some advantage that I'm overlooking?
- Mark
- why recommend \relative to take a "c"?,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Graham Percival, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, David Kastrup, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Neil Puttock, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Graham Percival, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Neil Puttock, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Neil Puttock, 2009/12/15