[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"? |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:01:42 +0000 |
2009/12/15 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> 1) "why is `\relative {' being deprecated" -- see the mailist
> archives. I don't know the details, but Han-Wen suggested it, and
> he's the person who'd know. :)
A good reason would be that it would allow \relative to be removed
from the parser: currently we need two parser rules to cater for both
cases, whereas deprecating \relative { } would allow the command to be
implemented as a music function instead.
I know this can wait until GLISS starts, but I think we should finally
remove it (I have a patch waiting in the wings. :)
Cheers,
Neil
- why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Mark Polesky, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Graham Percival, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, David Kastrup, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Graham Percival, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Neil Puttock, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Neil Puttock, 2009/12/15
- Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/12/15
Re: why recommend \relative to take a "c"?, James Bailey, 2009/12/15