lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Autobeaming


From: Carl Sorensen
Subject: Re: Autobeaming
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0700



On 12/29/09 8:41 AM, "Carl Sorensen" <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/29/09 4:48 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Carl
>> 
>> This looks like a much better approach.  It means the
>> special \overrideTimeSignatureSettings will be required
>> only rarely, and setting autoBeamRules for just the
>> current time signature should have a much simpler
>> format as the time signature is known - is that right?
> 
> Sort of.
> 
> I wouldn't recommend setting autoBeamRules for the current time signature,
> because that setting will disappear if the time signature changes.
> 
> I think that proper way to get new autoBeamRules is to override the
> timeSignatureSettings.
> 
> But if one wants to avoid that complication, one can just set autoBeamRules
> for the current time signature.
> 

I think I've got a consistent idea now.  I think I can add a property
(probably 'details to avoid namespace pollution, but maybe
timeSignatureDefaults) to the TimeSignature grob.

Then I can use standard /override and /revert to set the autobeaming rules.

What do you think of that idea?

Carl





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]