[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autobeaming
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Autobeaming |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:27:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
Hans Aberg <address@hidden> writes:
> Take tuplets. If there are quintuplets, then it should be a 5' unless
> specified as typically 2'+3' or 3'+2'.
>
> For sextuplets, there is a convention that the should be in 3, so
> there is an implicit rule 3'+3' - there should be no subbeaming of the
> 3'. But a compose might want to change that.
I am not sure I understand that. Why use sextuplets when you could just
use triplets as 3'+3'? I should think that sextuplets make most sense
when you need 2'+2'+2' as a rhythmic pattern.
I have had very little exposure to them, actually, that's just my
mathematical gut feeling.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/29
- Re: Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/29
- Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/29
- Re: Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/29
- Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/30
- Re: Autobeaming,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Autobeaming, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/12/30
- Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/30
- Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/30