[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/ |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:25:55 -0000 |
Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:18 AM
Francisco Vila wrote:
Compile stopped there, then I removed the @ref and compile
succeeded; I even added a warning following Graham. An
extra point is: nobody told she could compile the docs
without the remove.
I just successfully compiled commit 715dc5e, which contains
the @ref being discussed. Am I doing something wrong? Why
would it work for me and not for everyone else? The reason
it's important to me is because I don't want to commit
something un-compilable.
Mark, I replied too hastily last night. I think
you are right after all, although I don't have time
right now to actually compile the docs to check.
I'll do it a little later today.
Following Francisco's "correction" my local check
on reference validity now says
Warning: xref should be internal around line 231 in
included/compile.itexi
Warning: xref should be internal around line 761 in
included/compile.itexi
so I think these two should be set back to straight @refs.
Trevor
- Problem in docs: ref in included/, Francisco Vila, 2010/03/01
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/, Graham Percival, 2010/03/01
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/, Francisco Vila, 2010/03/01
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/, Mark Polesky, 2010/03/01
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/, Francisco Vila, 2010/03/01
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/, Trevor Daniels, 2010/03/01
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/, Mark Polesky, 2010/03/01
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/, Graham Percival, 2010/03/02
- Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/, Trevor Daniels, 2010/03/02