[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instanciable scheme engraver (issue216066)
|
From: |
dak |
|
Subject: |
Re: Instanciable scheme engraver (issue216066) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:52:24 +0000 |
The use of modules oop and goops appears to me as part of a programming
practice at a different knowledge level than to be expected from the
audience of this example.
If I rewrite the example to get along without those modules, are there
chances that the results will get accepted?
http://codereview.appspot.com/216066/show
- Re: Instanciable scheme engraver (issue216066),
dak <=