[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instanciable scheme engraver (issue216066)
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: Instanciable scheme engraver (issue216066) |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:21:54 +0100 |
Le 3 mars 2010 à 14:52, address@hidden a écrit :
> The use of modules oop and goops appears to me as part of a programming
> practice at a different knowledge level than to be expected from the
> audience of this example.
>
> If I rewrite the example to get along without those modules, are there
> chances that the results will get accepted?
Please do, David. There are requests for simplifications.