[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build oddities
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Build oddities |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:29:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:38:03AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> >> It seems my CG revision caused a little confusion.
> >> Should I make the three subsections of CG 3.6 into
> >> separate sections?
> >
> > No, I think that's fine. This should be addressed within
> > the Programming chapter by increasing the visibility
> > (maybe a @warning, maybe making it a separate section,
> > maybe including it in a list of steps for making a patch,
> > etc).
>
> Sorry, I don't follow what you're saying: "increasing the
> visibility" of what?
"Increase the visibility" of regression testing. We want code
contributors to have no doubt about how to check if their
patch(es) break anything, so a link to CG 3.6.3 (possibly with
additional explanation and encouragement) should be very visible
from somewhere in the programming chapter.
Cheers,
- Graham