[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypon
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?) |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:54:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Actually, [c16 d e f] is *not* valid lilypond. The first brace needs to
>>> come after the c16:
>>
>>> So I don't think there's a problem with the options coming after the
>>> {lilypond}.
>>
>> Oh right. Wow.
>
> Took a look at lilypond-book.py. Did one change and am just now
> recompiling.
>
> The change is fairly obvious (hope it works):
It didn't, but the following on Rietveld should:
<URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/813048>
I still have no clue about the following, though:
> However, I am doing this more or less pattern-based without any
> knowledge of the program structure, and lilypond-book.py _also_ contains
>
> FILTER: r'''\begin{lilypond}[%(options)s]
> %(code)s
> \end{lilypond}''',
>
> which already _has_ the normal LaTeX order for some reason. So what
> gives?
--
David Kastrup
- Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, David Kastrup, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, David Kastrup, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, David Kastrup, 2010/04/19
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, David Kastrup, 2010/04/19
- Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?), Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, David Kastrup, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, David Kastrup, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, David Kastrup, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/04/20