[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:49:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:54:15AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Took a look at lilypond-book.py. Did one change and am just now
>> > recompiling.
>> >
>> > The change is fairly obvious (hope it works):
>>
>> It didn't, but the following on Rietveld should:
>>
>> <URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/813048>
>
> I like the general idea; I'll try testing it tomorrow.
>
> A few caveats:
> - we definitely need a CHANGES entry for this syntax change.
I don't know how to do this one.
> - there's two latex files in Documentation/usage/. I'm not
> certain if they're actually used in the docs anywhere, but they
> should probably be updated just in case.
Fixed.
> - in general, a grep to find \begin[*]{lilypond} (I don't know
> how exactly to express that in grep-terminology) would be very
> good.
Done. Somewhat annoyingly, one occurence is
Documentation/misc/CHANGES-0.1:969: - changed \begin[options]{mudela} to
\begin{mudela}[options]
This suggests that in version 0.1 somebody already fixed exactly that
LaTeX syntax problem 12 years ago. And the fix did not survive.
--
David Kastrup
- Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, David Kastrup, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, David Kastrup, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/18
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, David Kastrup, 2010/04/19
- Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?, David Kastrup, 2010/04/19
- Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?), David Kastrup, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?), Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, David Kastrup, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, David Kastrup, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/04/21