Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Nicolas Sceaux
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> What type signatures would be actually permissable under the assumption
>> that they are supported by lexer and parser?
>>
>> It is somewhat clear to me that we can't have markup-list followed by
>> markup in the arguments.  Anything else?
>
> I'd say, a markup-list command signature should follow the pattern:
>
>   scheme* markup* markup-list*
>
> that is, any number of scheme arguments, then any number of single markup
> arguments, then any number of markup-list arguments, even though I don't
> know if having several markup list arguments is useful or not (and if it's
> doable).

AFAICR the ordering is just there for syntax consistency. If you can
make a patch that generalizes markup argument handling like the
argument handling for music functions, that would be awesome.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen