Re: Inconsistent placing of TrillSpanners when not using \stopTrillSpan

[Carl Sorensen]

On 7/7/10 7:23 AM, "Carl Sorensen" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 7/7/10 6:56 AM, "James Lowe" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> What I don't understand is why the middle example shows that the second
>> trill allows for the 'overlap' but the first and third don't and the
>> trills effectively run into each other.
> 
> Actually, all 3 work as expected -- the TrillSpanner stops, and a new
> TrillSpanner is created.

On further review, I see that my answer was incorrect.  I'm sorry for the
noise.

Thanks,

Carl