[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jul 2010 21:25:56 +0100 |
On 8 July 2010 19:47, Joseph Wakeling <address@hidden> wrote:
> (Example: take the music of bb. 9-10 in the sample music, and
> put it through the _original_ naturalizeMusic function. You get
> left with a g-double-flat instead of an f-natural.)
You're using 2.12, I assume?
Since 2.13.14, transpositions greater than a double are normalized
automatically, so the original \naturalizeMusic also produces an f
natural here (see attached output using latest git).
Cheers,
Neil
naturalize.png
Description: PNG image
- Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/09
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/09
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Carl Sorensen, 2010/07/09
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/11
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/10
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/10