[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:12:59 +0100 |
On 9 July 2010 22:35, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yes, but it's only in LilyPond miscellany, so it's really not important ;)
Heh, not important enough to deserve a separate menu node. ;)
> BTW, are you OK with me pushing the auto-beaming stuff?
Sorry, I was expecting another patch set for some reason, though
having just looked, I see most of the issues raised have been dealt
with.
I'll look at it in more detail later.
Cheers,
Neil
- Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/09
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/09
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Carl Sorensen, 2010/07/09
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/10
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/10
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/11