[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045)
From: |
n . puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045) |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:04:59 +0000 |
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/2
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/2#newcode125
lily/axis-group-interface.cc:125: pure_height_cache =
scm_c_make_hash_table (1000);
This default size appears to be too big (at least for my poor computer,
which imploded trying to run `make check': it swallowed all the memory
(2 Gb) and virtual memory shot up to 4 Gb before I put it out of its
misery :)
I tried reducing it to 100, which incurred a slight performance penalty
due to rehashing, but allowed the regtest checks to finish.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/show
- Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), lemzwerg, 2010/07/14
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045),
n . puttock <=
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), joeneeman, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), joeneeman, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/23
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/23
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), arnonokia6230, 2010/07/31
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/31