[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045)
From: |
arnonokia6230 |
Subject: |
Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045) |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:59:29 +0000 |
On 2010/07/23 21:49:50, Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Joe,
I haven't been able to replicate the problems I had running `make
check', even
with the hash table default set to 1000; I guess that means LGTM. :)
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/10001/11001
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/10001/11001#newcode849
lily/axis-group-interface.cc:849: "rest-pure-height-cache "
move below pure-relevant-spanners
Hm, i am seeing huge memory problems here. What is the trick finally?
Cheers, Arno
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/show
- Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), lemzwerg, 2010/07/14
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/15
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), joeneeman, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), joeneeman, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/21
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/23
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/23
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045),
arnonokia6230 <=
- Re: Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045), n . puttock, 2010/07/31