Re: Add user-init option to include a custom init snippet (not replacing the whole init file) (issue1901042)

[Carl Sorensen]

On 7/28/10 4:49 AM, "Ian Hulin" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Reinhold,
> On 28/07/10 01:43, address@hidden wrote:
>> Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
>> 
>> 
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001
>> File ly/init.ly (right):
>> 
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001#newcode26
>> ly/init.ly:26: #(if (ly:get-option 'user-init)
>> On 2010/07/27 20:16:58, Neil Puttock wrote:
>>> user-include ?
>> 
>> Hmm, actually, I don't like either user-init (indicates it's part of the
>> init sequence and has similar uses as the --init command line option;
>> also it sounds too technical) nor user-include (to me that sounds like
>> setting an include path)...
>> 
>> How about custom-definitions or user-definitions (no, sounds too much
>> like it defines users)?
> How about --user-startup or --custom-startup?
> 
> The real problem you have here is that we use --init option to supersede
> the whole startup/initialization file.  This one is an additional one to
> do just for this user session, so user-startup says what it does on the can.

How about --extra-init, or --include-init ?

Carl