lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fix 1198: Fix displayLilyMusic for \time and #(set-time-signature) (


From: Carl . D . Sorensen
Subject: Re: Fix 1198: Fix displayLilyMusic for \time and #(set-time-signature) (issue1986042)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:25:43 +0000

Let me know about the filename for the new callbacks, and I'll add that
to this patch and push it.

THanks,

Carl


http://codereview.appspot.com/1986042/diff/1/2
File scm/define-music-display-methods.scm (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/1986042/diff/1/2#newcode887
scm/define-music-display-methods.scm:887: (let* ((arguments
(ly:music-property expr 'time-signature-arguments))
On 2010/08/13 21:25:13, Neil Puttock wrote:
I'd prefer separate properties since it would make the output of
\displayMusic
less cryptic.

There's already 'numerator and 'denominator (which are currently used
for
\times, even though their docstrings mention \time).

Ah, got it.  I hadn't thought of displayMusic.  Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/1986042/diff/1/2#newcode897
scm/define-music-display-methods.scm:897: "#(set-time-signature ~a ~a
~a)~a"
On 2010/08/13 21:25:13, Neil Puttock wrote:
"#(set-time-signature ~a ~a '~a)~a"

Of course!  Thanks, Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/1986042/diff/1/4
File scm/define-music-types.scm (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/1986042/diff/1/4#newcode53
scm/define-music-types.scm:53: (define (make-time-signature-set music)
On 2010/08/13 21:25:13, Neil Puttock wrote:
We should probably think about moving these to a separate file now
there's more
than one callback.


maybe something like scm/define-music-callbacks.scm ?

(naturally this can wait for another patch)

http://codereview.appspot.com/1986042/diff/1/5
File scm/music-functions.scm (left):

http://codereview.appspot.com/1986042/diff/1/5#oldcode507
scm/music-functions.scm:507: (define-public
(make-beam-rule-time-signature-set num den rest)
On 2010/08/13 21:25:13, Neil Puttock wrote:
Do you want to keep this?

Of course not.  Thanks for the catch.

Done

http://codereview.appspot.com/1986042/show



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]