[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Half-baked unused features.
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: Half-baked unused features. |
|
Date: |
Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:18:00 +0200 (CEST) |
>> Should it be wrapped in a full review process?
>
> I think so. The full review process for removing old stuff is
> generally very short and sweet (post the patch, somebody important
> says OK), so I don't think it hurts a bit to do it.
Well, IMHO, for trivial things: Just do it!
Werner
- Review: start work on markup doc and code (was: Half-baked unused features.), (continued)
- Review: start work on markup doc and code (was: Half-baked unused features.), David Kastrup, 2010/08/15
- Re: Half-baked unused features., David Kastrup, 2010/08/15
- Re: Half-baked unused features., Carl Sorensen, 2010/08/15
- Re: Half-baked unused features., David Kastrup, 2010/08/15
- git merge drivers (was: Half-baked unused features.), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/16
- Re: Half-baked unused features., Graham Percival, 2010/08/15
- Re: Half-baked unused features., David Kastrup, 2010/08/15
- Re: Half-baked unused features., Carl Sorensen, 2010/08/15
- Re: Half-baked unused features., Graham Percival, 2010/08/15
- Re: Half-baked unused features., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/08/16
Re: Half-baked unused features.,
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: Half-baked unused features., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/08/16