T1041 - Add descriptions for \bookOutputSuffix and \bookOutputName to documents (NR). (issue2004041)

[percival . music . ca]

Looks mostly good.


http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/diff/1/2
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/diff/1/2#newcode110
Documentation/notation/input.itely:110: @file{fandangoforelephants.pdf}
(or @file{fandangoforelephants.png},
or .eps, or .ps, or .svg... just mention .pdf.  Anybody doing weird
stuff will know what you mean.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/diff/1/2#newcode114
Documentation/notation/input.itely:114: must explicitly code a
@code{\book} block.
what?  Am I missing something here?  This sounds completely wrong.

LATER EDIT: err, ok, the comment about lilypond-book was related to
producing multiple scores in one book.  But that only refers to that
particular context; you can use lilypond-book without writing any
explicit \book blocks.  I do that all the time.

Please revert this change.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/diff/1/2#newcode422
Documentation/notation/input.itely:422: This behaviour can be changed by
setting the variable
Sorry, the doc policy explicitly calls for American spelling.  Please
revert this change.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/show