Re: T1041 - Add descriptions for \bookOutputSuffix and \bookOutputName to documents (NR). (issue2004041)

[ian]

Reviewers: Graham Percival,


http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/diff/1/2
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/diff/1/2#newcode110
Documentation/notation/input.itely:110: @file{fandangoforelephants.pdf}
(or @file{fandangoforelephants.png},
On 2010/08/16 09:31:24, Graham Percival wrote:
> or .eps, or .ps, or .svg... just mention .pdf.  Anybody doing weird
stuff will
> know what you mean.

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/diff/1/2#newcode114
Documentation/notation/input.itely:114: must explicitly code a
@code{\book} block.
On 2010/08/16 09:31:24, Graham Percival wrote:
> what?  Am I missing something here?  This sounds completely wrong.

> LATER EDIT: err, ok, the comment about lilypond-book was related to
producing
> multiple scores in one book.  But that only refers to that particular
context;
> you can use lilypond-book without writing any explicit \book blocks.
I do that
> all the time.

> Please revert this change.

Paragraph removed.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/diff/1/2#newcode422
Documentation/notation/input.itely:422: This behaviour can be changed by
setting the variable
On 2010/08/16 09:31:24, Graham Percival wrote:
> Sorry, the doc policy explicitly calls for American spelling.  Please
revert
> this change.

Under protest.
The doc policy sucks.
Webster was a dyslexic (ask any non-American chemist about element Al).

Description:
T1041 - Add descriptions for \bookOutputSuffix and \bookOutputName to
documents (NR).

Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/2004041/show

Affected files:
  M Documentation/notation/input.itely