Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

[Carl Sorensen]

On 11/6/10 6:46 PM, "Mark Polesky" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>> 9) initial-separation
>>>   * longer but describes the meaning more accurately now
>>>     we have an item-item-spacing format
>>> 
>>> I vote for 8 or 9.
>> 
>> 9.
> 
> Does this entail changing 'minimum-distance to
> 'minimum-separation?  I prefer both to use the same noun.

Yes, I'm OK with minimum-separation, where separation is the separation
between reference points.

But I'm fine with 8 as well -- with all the work we've done on distance it
may be better to just stay with distance.

Carl