[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LilyPond speed. Idea for Schikkers list
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: LilyPond speed. Idea for Schikkers list |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 23:27:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 |
Ha!
-----Original Message-----
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>
Reply-To: <address@hidden>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:59:23 -0300
To: Janek Warchoł <address@hidden>
Cc: Lilypond Dev <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: LilyPond speed. Idea for Schikkers list
>2011/3/6 Janek Warchoł <address@hidden>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> how fast would be LilyPond if we turned off collision detecting,
>> optical spacing, line breaking, beam quanting and sloping, slur
>> shaping, etc etc etc - basically everything except placing symbols on
>> paper in one infinately long system?
>
>You can easily try this out yourself. Just set ragged-right=##t and
>set linelength to 100 meters (or something).
I knew Graham's new paper size was for something!
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/34808
That, Jean-Charles, is known in comedy as a 'back reference'!
;)
..
And Goodnight!
James
>