Re: Allows glissandi between chords (issue4442082)

[Carl Sorensen]

On 4/26/11 5:55 AM, "address@hidden" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:30 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> 

>> File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
>> 
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/4442082/diff/3001/scm/define-grob-properties.sc
>> m#newcode412
>> scm/define-grob-properties.scm:412: (glissando-index ,integer? "The
>> index of a glissando in its note
>> It seems to me like this should be an internal grob property, rather
>> than a user grob property, and that it need not be part of an interface.
>> I can't imagine how it ought to be tweaked by the user.
> 
> Even if a property is moved to an internal property in
> define-grob-properties.scm, doesn't it still need to be declared in an
> interface so that internals.texi may be written?

As far as I can see, most of the internal properties don't have interfaces.
And they don't show up in internals.texi.

I think I'm OK with this as a policy -- internal properties aren't to be
changed by the user.

Thanks,

Carl