[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041)
|
From: |
Neil Puttock |
|
Subject: |
Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:19:59 +0100 |
On 21 October 2011 07:50, Mike Solomon <address@hidden> wrote:
> Of this I am not sure. My gut says yes, but I don't know why the regtest
> that skips quanting was added and the extent to which quantless-beams are
> used by users.
Never, I'd imagine. I certainly don't recall any users wanting to
switch it off. I'm just thinking it would be better off being an
internal property.
I might have a few more comments once I've got Ubuntu running again.
Cheers,
Neil
Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041), pkx166h, 2011/10/03
Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041), pkx166h, 2011/10/05
Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041), pkx166h, 2011/10/06
Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041), n . puttock, 2011/10/20
Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041), k-ohara5a5a, 2011/10/26
Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041), mtsolo, 2011/10/26