Re: Sketch for broken beams with consistent slopes (issue 4961041)

[Mike Solomon]

Thanks Neil!

On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:24 PM, address@hidden wrote:

> http://codereview.appspot.com/4961041/diff/60001/scm/define-grob-properties.scm
> File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4961041/diff/60001/scm/define-grob-properties.scm#newcode749
> scm/define-grob-properties.scm:749: (skip-quanting ,boolean? "Should
> beam quanting be skipped?")
> Is this likely to be used outside regression testing?

Of this I am not sure.  My gut says yes, but I don't know why the regtest that 
skips quanting was added and the extent to which quantless-beams are used by 
users.

Cheers,
MS