Re: Doc writing for unpure-pure-containers

[Ian Hulin]

Hi Mike,
On 14/11/11 10:18, address@hidden wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> I've answered a couple questions recently where
> unpure-pure-containers have come in handy and think it'd be
> beneficial to have some text in the notation manual about them.
> However, understanding pure properties is scary for developers, so
> I'd imagine that it'd be downright nightmarish for users.  James -
> would you be interested in helping me out with this? I think that
> you're good at formulating things in a way that people understand.
> 
> Cheers, MS
Why are you using unpure rather than impure in the name? It make my
internal spelling checker's alarm bells ring.

Cheers,
Ian