[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nonfastforwarding push to staging
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Nonfastforwarding push to staging |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:59:36 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 08:10:06PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
> It would look somewhat like the following (untested)
-snip-
> However, in order not to give Savannah hackers too many headaches, I'd
> recommend that you create a special user account for administration
> (does not actually need to be privileged on the web interface), and we
> let the script check for this account, and bypass all checks when called
> by this user. I assume that you would not want to have this behavior
> for your normal account.
I've saved this in a separate email folder and will look at it
sometime in Dec. If anybody else wants to deal with it, they're
welcome to do so.
Sorry,
- Graham
Re: Nonfastforwarding push to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/13
Re: Nonfastforwarding push to staging,
Graham Percival <=