lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: automatic handling of staging


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: automatic handling of staging
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:36:51 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)

Peekay Ex <address@hidden> writes:

> This is from the terminal (run at about 06:45 BST today)
>
> --snip--
> address@hidden:~/Desktop$ python compile_lilypond_test.py
> Branch test-master-lock set up to track remote branch master from
> origin.

lock created

> Branch test-staging set up to track remote branch staging from origin.

Reference for staging created (not sure whether one really needs that,
I'll have to experiment a bit).

> Initialized empty Git repository in
> /home/jlowe/patchy/src-2011-11-17-06/.git/

Made a copy of the repository in order not to disturb work in your original.

> Updating 6381b50..0846249
> Fast-forward
>  lily/parser.yy |   85 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)

Advanced master in that copy to staging.

> To /home/jlowe/lilypond-git
>    6381b50..0846249  test-master-lock -> test-master-lock
> Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)

Transferred the advanced test-master-lock to the main repository.

Presumably silently did the testing.

> To ssh://address@hidden/srv/git/lilypond.git
>    6381b50..0846249  test-master-lock -> master

Pushed it upstream.

> warning: deleting branch 'test-master-lock' that has been merged to
>          'refs/remotes/origin/master', but it is not yet merged to HEAD.
> Deleted branch test-master-lock (was 0846249).

Deleted the lock file.  Perhaps we should use -D instead of -d to avoid
the warning (and avoid problems when it has _not_ been pushed).

> address@hidden:~/Desktop$

> I haven' done any manual pushing or checking in git as I have to leave
> for work now.

It has been done automatically anyway.

> Hope this was ok.

Looks as it should.

-- 
David Kastrup




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]