Re: LSR updates (again)

[David Kastrup]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> OK - I'm having another go at getting the LSR updates into git.
> Graham's recommended method for this (which I will add to the CG) is
> to run makelsr locally, with no downloaded updates - this simply
> aligns git with any changes makelsr automatically makes.  Attached is
> a patch after this process, which looks completely innocuous to me.
> In order to get the process rolling quickly, I'd like to push this to
> staging, but would appreciate someone else (David, Graham?) looking at
> it just to check.

I have no clue about the LSR processes (or we would not be in that
particular fix anyway).  Perhaps Neil?

> I'd prefer not to go to a Rietveld for this simple change.

It does not really make sense, yes.

-- 
David Kastrup