[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062)
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:14:58 +0000 |
On 23 January 2012 01:02, <address@hidden> wrote:
> Regarding comments by Neil and Bertrand:
>
> I rewrote Stem::is_normal_stem the way Neil suggested. Looking at the
> code in Stem.cc, it appears that both ways are being used to check the
> style property. I don't know which is the more correct.
Strictly speaking, Bertrand is more correct. But there's still no
need to convert to a string. If we want to be paranoid about such
comparisons, it would be better to use scm_is_eq () for comparing
symbols.
Cheers,
Neil
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), (continued)
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), janek . lilypond, 2012/01/11
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), aleksandr . andreev, 2012/01/11
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), aleksandr . andreev, 2012/01/12
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), aleksandr . andreev, 2012/01/12
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), janek . lilypond, 2012/01/17
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), n . puttock, 2012/01/18
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), bordage . bertrand, 2012/01/22
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), aleksandr . andreev, 2012/01/22
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062),
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), aleksandr . andreev, 2012/01/24
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), julien . rioux, 2012/01/24
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), janek . lilypond, 2012/01/24
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), aleksandr . andreev, 2012/01/24
- Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062), julien . rioux, 2012/01/24