Re: Stable 2.16 releases (dictator)

[Janek Warchoł]

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:30 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
>> I suggest that you keep any such decision to yourself until
>> just before the next stable is built, or defer making it until
>> then.  Otherwise interest in fixed such bugs will wane.
>
> And in the interest of making a release, I want to have people
> prioritize on those bugs that will affect the release.  That's the main
> point of having priorities in the first place.

Do you think we shall have a "priority" field in our tracker again?
Don't get me wrong: i don't want to give priorities to all issues!  I
think that abandoning old priorities was reasonable because they
didn't mean anything.  It would only make sense to use 2 or 3 levels
(critical, high, low(?)) and use them sparingly (no more than a dozen
high-priority issues, preferably just a few).

Janek