[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Syntax change proposal:
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Syntax change proposal: |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2012 03:46:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> One really ugly problem is interpreting things like "4.". Looks like a
> duration, but then we have
> input/regression/dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly: line-width = 4.\cm
I am against making a change like this outwith[1] of GLISS. It
could involve a lot of user pain (and documentation-editing
pain!), so I think it's important to at least pretend[2] to have
good user consultation beforehand.
[1] that's the only part of Scottish vocabular or accent that I've
been able to pick up, so I'm sticking to it.
[2] the phrase "at least pretend" doesn't mean that we will _only_
be pretending.
As far as the actual proposal goes, I'm generally in favor.
- Graham
- Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: Syntax change proposal:,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Syntax change proposal:, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/19