[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:40:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Francisco Vila <address@hidden> writes:
> 2012/7/24 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> convert-ly can't work reliably since it does not understand the
>> structure of LilyPond files.
> (...)
>> Reliable conversions need to understand structure. You can do them on
>> XML. LilyPond is too complex.
> (...)
>
> Right, so a "perfect" convert-ly would solve all problems but this is
> impossible. Then, it is now clear to me that a syntax stability for a
> long period of time is very desirable.
>
> Besides, I have weighted more than once the possibility of updating
> all Mutopia music. That would improve its value (and the opposite,
> i.e. doing nothing is effectively making it to lose its value more and
> more).
That sounds like a good user community project. It is very important
for that sort of thing to have timely response to user contributions. I
believe that the current Mutopia project may be a bit problematic in
that department. Some automated and semi-automated procedures
(proof-reading interfaces?) might help with that.
> Just thinking aloud, sorry. I don't want to waste your time. I realize
> this is fairly naïve.
When "naïve" serves the majority of a large user community...
--
David Kastrup
- GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Graham Percival, 2012/07/24
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Ian Hulin, 2012/07/24
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Nicolas Sceaux, 2012/07/24
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Andrew Hawryluk, 2012/07/25
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Keith OHara, 2012/07/25
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Trevor Daniels, 2012/07/26
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/26