[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:20:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:20:43AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> To me, a Grand Input Syntax "fixing" of LilyPond, would amount to
> creating a syntax that strictly separates parsing and interpretation.
> This implies not only rethinking a lot of syntax, but also it means
> letting go of some of the flexibility and conciseness of the current
> format.
Ok, consider one single "fix". Change:
{ \[ c'2 d' \] }
into:
{ c'2 \[ d' \] }
The old "enclosing" method of spanners (i.e. beams and slurs in
lilypond 1.x) is almost completely deprecated now. Why not take
the next step and fix ligatures as well? That would make the
syntax more consistent.
- Graham
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, (continued)
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/01
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/02
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/02
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/02
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/02
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Benkő Pál, 2012/09/03
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/03
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/03
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/04
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/04