[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:48:33 +0200 |
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Ouch. Sound like something we seriously don't want at all.
>>
>> Right - this means that we seriously don't want to be a music
>> interchange/storage format.
>
> What about a *subset* of LilyPond for this purpose?
Yeah - if that made sense, it would be quite nice.
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, (continued)
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Benkő Pál, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Joe Neeman, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Joe Neeman, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/04