[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: allowing \f and \F
From: |
Sue Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: allowing \f and \F |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:19:03 +0100 |
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, September 23, 2012 3:20 AM
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:25:17PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> I don't want to differentiate between predefined and user-defined
>> commands.
>
> That's certainly a consistent view to take, but it might be worth
> discussing that further at some point. If there's a separate
> namespace then I can't see any technical problems, and some users
> may appreciate being able to define short strings like $a or $f
> without any conflict with existing commands and keywords.
Other users may wish to redefine predefs. That ability is more
valuable, I think.
>> You are aware that LilyPond allows _any_ utf-8 character outside of the
>> ASCII page in strings, identifiers and note names already?
>
> Obviously not. I wonder how many non-English speakers are aware
> of this -- do we have an example of this in the Learning or
> Notation manuals?
I don't think so, although it has been mentioned on -User. I guess
we need a doc issue for this so it doesn't get forgotten ;)
Trevor
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Graham Percival, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/22
- Re: allowing \f and \F,
Sue Daniels <=
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/23
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/09/24
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20
- Message not available
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Thomas Morley, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/21
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/21