Re: allowing \f and \F

[Graham Percival]

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 09:19:03AM +0100, Sue Daniels wrote:
> 
> Graham Percival wrote Sunday, September 23, 2012 3:20 AM
> 
> > That's certainly a consistent view to take, but it might be worth
> > discussing that further at some point.  If there's a separate
> > namespace then I can't see any technical problems, and some users
> > may appreciate being able to define short strings like $a or $f
> > without any conflict with existing commands and keywords.
> 
> Other users may wish to redefine predefs.  That ability is more
> valuable, I think.

Nothing's stopping us from having the normal \commands (including
both predefs and user-created and user-redefined), along with
$commands (which is completely empty and available for any user
definitions).

- Graham