[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [talk] easy tuplets
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [talk] easy tuplets |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:27:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> Interesting. Apart from which one would produce tuplet brackets,
> maybe *x/y notation would allow us to distinguish between
>
> \times 2/3 { b16 b b }
> \times 2/3 { b16 b b }
>
> and
>
> \times 4/6 { b16 b b b b b }
>
> by writing { b16*2/3 b b b b b } and { b16*4/6 b b b b b },
> respectively?
No, it happens that the scale factor of durations is indeed a scalar
rational rather than an integer pair, so the latter two are
indistinguishable.
> b12 is still more brief, though.
>
> As for \times 2/3 {c8. c16}, {c12. c24} seems clear enough from my
> perspective. No idea whether "computers will like it", though :)
I don't like it since it does not match musical concepts. You would not
talk about "12th notes" to other musicians.
--
David Kastrup
- [talk] easy tuplets, Graham Percival, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Francisco Vila, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Keith OHara, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Francisco Vila, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Keith OHara, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Benkő Pál, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/25
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Ian Hulin, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Keith OHara, 2012/09/25