[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [talk] easy tuplets
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: [talk] easy tuplets |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:38:12 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Opera Mail/12.01 (Win32) |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:51:43 -0700, Francisco Vila <address@hidden> wrote:
2012/9/24 Janek Warchoł <address@hidden>:
Seriously though, i think this syntax would be very useful for
algorithmic composers and computer programs manipulating Lily code.
Another advantage is code readability and ease of copying it (shall i
elaborate?)
Besides, it's not like we would loose any functionality: \times would
still be there.
This convinces me. I'm for it.
I'll be against it. I make typos of c3 or c5 when I want to type c4
Let the algorithmic composers write c4*4/5
Let the humans use \tuplet as proposed years ago,
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-12/msg00489.html>
and which is easy to implement (attached) now that David has added the
infrastructure to write music-functions that take fractions, and optional
arguments (although I'm not sure if the optional argument is wise in this case).
tuplet.ly
Description: Binary data
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, (continued)
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Francisco Vila, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Keith OHara, 2012/09/23
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Francisco Vila, 2012/09/24
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Benkő Pál, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, David Kastrup, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/25
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Ian Hulin, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/27
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Keith OHara, 2012/09/25
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/25
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, James, 2012/09/25
- Re: [talk] easy tuplets, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/27