[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:38:49 +0200 |
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> \beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] }
>>>
>>> +----+ +----+----+
>>> +----+ +----+ -+
>>> | | | | |
>>>
>>
>> First we would need to get this manner of specifying subbeams work
>> properly in manually beamed music. I don't think that manual beams
>> currently nest in that manner.
>
> OK, ok :-) I'm just doing some brainstorming. I'm quite sure that
> subbeaming with more than a single `[' has already been discussed a
> longer time ago, but I can't remember the outcome.
The original intent was for duplicate requests in most of these cases
to be ignored, so you could combine multiple identifiers into chords,
eg.
vOne = { c8[ d] }
vTwo = { e8[ f] }
forScore = \new Voice {
<< \vOne \vTwo >>
}
without this affecting the typesetting.
I would advise against overloading the meaning of existing constructs,
as it will have compatiblility implications.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: Feature request, (continued)
Re: Feature request, Mats Bengtsson, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Xavier Scheuer, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24