[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:19:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> This could probably be
>>>>
>>>> \beaming {8[ 8] 8 8 8[ 8 8 8] }
>>>>
>>>> So we have another result of GLISS.
>>>
>>> Actually, I like David's original proposal better if the semantics
>>> of the construction is to both typeset the particular music and to
>>> use it as a template for a beaming rule.
>>
>> The disadvantage would be that you lose the option of using a more
>> abstract specification like above, whether or not adorned with a
>> placeholder pitch like c or not.
>
> Yes. I would go even one step further, defining subbeams also.
>
> Example:
>
> \beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] }
>
> +----+ +----+----+
> +----+ +----+ -+
> | | | | |
>
First we would need to get this manner of specifying subbeams work
properly in manually beamed music. I don't think that manual beams
currently nest in that manner.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Feature request, (continued)
- Re: Feature request, Mats Bengtsson, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Xavier Scheuer, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24