[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:19:23 +0200 |
David,
On Monday, September 24, 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> > Not necessarily. An alternative would be:
> >
> > \beaming { 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 8 8 ] }
> > \beaming { 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 ] }
> >
> > which would set the beam patterns for both the current time signatures.
>
> "both the current time signatures"? You not just refuse to accept that
> at the call time of \beaming, we don't have a current time signature
> available, but now we even have _two_ of them?
>
> Presumably you mean with "current time signature" something determined
> from the length of the expression (rendering absurd your suggestion to
> flag an error when the expression is not a whole bar long), but that
> still does not tell us what baseMoment to use. The total length of a
> 3/4 and a 6/8 measure is the same.
I'm not Phil, but to me your reply sounds offensive. I've probably
completely misunderstood you, but nevertheless i wanted you to know
that there might be something wrong with your email.
best,
Janek
- Re: Feature request, (continued)
- Re: Feature request, Graham Percival, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Feature request, Graham Percival, 2012/09/30
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Mats Bengtsson, 2012/09/24