[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:36:09 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:37:32PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Not necessarily. An alternative would be:
>
> \beaming { 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 8 8 ] }
> \beaming { 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 ] }
or maybe:
\beaming {
{ 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 8 8 ] }
{ 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 ] }
}
It's probably easier to keep track of what's happening (in terms
of programming) if there's a single command call; otherwise it
wouldn't be clear if both beamings were supposed to apply, or
whether the second one should clear the first one.
- Graham
- Re: Feature request, (continued)
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Mats Bengtsson, 2012/09/24