lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Update LSR version to 2.16


From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: Update LSR version to 2.16
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 14:11:30 +0100

2012/12/7 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Xavier Scheuer" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "LilyPond Development" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:04 AM
> Subject: Update LSR version to 2.16
>
>
>
>> On 2 November 2012 17:31, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> They don't need to. Snippets in the LSR have to work with the current
>>> version of lily that the LSR runs - currently 2.14, IIRC.  If they can be
>>> updated by convert-ly, there's no need for them in snippets/new.
>>> snippets/new is really there for snippets that don't work at all and
>>> can't
>>> be converted - for example, one that uses a tick as a breath mark could
>>> not
>>> be placed into the LSR at all.
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Lilypond 2.16 is out since August 24, 2012.
>> I assume it is planed to upgrade the version of LilyPond installed on
>> the LSR (currently 2.14.2, 16 month-old) to 2.16.
>>
>> Phil, are you currently in the process of upgrading LilyPond's version
>> running the LSR?  Or is someone else in charge of these technical
>> aspects of the LSR?
>>
>> There are some really nice features using post-2.14 only code that
>> really deserve to be (at least) present in the LSR, and it would be
>> nice if one does not need to "comment most of your LilyPond code so
>> that your snippet can be accepted by the LSR" with code that compiles
>> on *current* stable version.
>>
>> Like Neil's #multi-mark-engraver for instance.
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00157.html
>>
>> Thank you for you attention.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Xavier
>
>
>
> Sebastiano is the only person who can actually upgrade the LSR.  I recall
> Harm tried to contact him earlier but got no response.  Do you think it
> worth trying again Thomas?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes

Hi Phil,

I tried to contact Seba weeks ago, because of bad LSR-images, but he
didn't reply.
It's definitely worth a second try.

If there is agreement about updating the LSR, we should ask him, too.


-Harm



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]