Re: Oversight in rest-by-number

[David Kastrup]

Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:

> I noticed an oversight in \rest-by-number
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2966
> resulting in a bad/wrong example in the NR.
>
> What's the way to fix it:
> a) revert the patch
> or
> b) create a followup
> ?

If the oversight only affects uses of \rest-by-number and does not cause
compilation of either code or docs to abort, there is nothing gained by
reverting the patch.  So it would appear a timely course of b) would be
appropriate.

-- 
David Kastrup