Re: Oversight in rest-by-number

[Thomas Morley]

2012/12/12 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I noticed an oversight in \rest-by-number
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2966
>> resulting in a bad/wrong example in the NR.
>>
>> What's the way to fix it:
>> a) revert the patch
>> or
>> b) create a followup
>> ?
>
> If the oversight only affects uses of \rest-by-number and does not cause
> compilation of either code or docs to abort, there is nothing gained by
> reverting the patch.  So it would appear a timely course of b) would be
> appropriate.
>
> --
> David Kastrup

It's only the given, bad example.

So I'll follow b)

Thanks,
  Harm