Re: Avoid excessive number of dots in chords (#3179). (issue 7319049)

[lemzwerg]

> We do lose the double-dot on  << f'4.. \\ f'2. >>

Yes.  As shown in the scanned Beethoven example in #3179, what lilypond
currently does with `chord-dots' off is not correct either...

> Well, Gould is showing the usual case, where notes have
> Dots.staff-position = 0.  You were asking for opinions
> on the optimal way to behave for users who override
> Dots.staff-position.  You could generalize by using the
> requested Dots position 'p' (which is exactly the NoteHead
> position in the simple case) in place of the note-head
> position.

Thanks for the suggestion.  In case there is ever the need to improve my
solution, you give a recipe to do that :-)


https://codereview.appspot.com/7319049/