Re: compilation errors from Xcode's new standard library

[David Kastrup]

Mike Solomon <address@hidden> writes:

> Apple’s home cooked clang is not free software, so there’s no reason
> to expect free software to compile with it.

Non sequitur.  There is nothing wrong with trying to bring some more
taste of free software to people in the Apple jails.  Now there are
alternative means, so it's not high urgency.  In particular, if you are
the only person we've heard of so far and already moved to an
alternative: we run into danger of putting in a lot of work for purely
imaginary users.

> I don’t mind giving up on it.

Shrug.  At any rate, it would be important to get some feedback
regarding installation of the stock LilyPond binary distribution on the
newest OSX.  It would be good if that worked before we put out 2.18.

-- 
David Kastrup